Free Will cannot exist.

Our model of the universe is ever more revealing reality as a finite container in motion, moved by a reactive process.  A reaction is the opposition to an initializing action and is consequentially deprived the process of choice or will.  If all movement is confined to this reactive process, we must deduce all reactions impossible, with exception to a specific course of movement conducted by the initializing of matter itself.  (This of course, pertains to the container of our reality, and not an alternate realization or dimension forged in the ambiance of a greater reality, or ‘container of the container’.) ((or area otherwise reserved for infinity))

The perception of free choice is the inference that the reactive process is subject to alteration influenced by the algorithms of human thought.  A hypothetical free choice outside of this process nullifies the reactive mechanics attached to the container, and cannot accordingly exist, as implied by our current model of it.  We therefore, postulate the anomaly as an illusion in flux, falsely streaming implications that our everyday perception includes choices that redetermine the outcome for a process already determined by the initializing itself.

This illusion of free choice conflicts with deductions forced by the mechanics of reaction, which alternatively decree our choices to be calculated by sequencing, determined by an initial action preceding the process of reaction. 

The illusion of free will relies completely on human susceptibility towards assumptions that disregard the possibility, that the human process of decision, is a natural component in the mechanism of reaction. It is human awareness that must take responsibility for manifesting this illusion. We spectate through the lens of human paradigm, while completely attached to the reaction that is space/time, and our awareness creates the illusion that we are outside of this reaction.

Advertisement

3 Responses to “Free Will cannot exist.”

  1. You know, I, uh, don’t really have anything to oppose this. I still maintain that there are instances which can change that don’t have much overall impact on the further reactions, much like observing an atom and expecting it to zig and seeing it zag. It’s exciting to think that we really don’t know everything there is about the universe, and that there is room even for major leaps in our understanding.

    So, um, there it is. Flexible will.

  2. atheistsnackbar Says:

    Thanks for your reply! I will ponder this and return a response to you in the next day or so :)

  3. atheistsnackbar Says:

    Sorry, I intended to get back to you today. My reply contains some illustrations I have to conjure up in ol’ photoshop, so there is a bit of a delay…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.